<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myth about Hand Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/</link>
	<description>Timeless Tools, Speculation, Husbandry, Making hand tools.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Woodworking Hits the Street &#124; Woodworking Blog</title>
		<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Woodworking Hits the Street &#124; Woodworking Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmakingart.com/?p=252#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>[...] The Myth about Hand Tools [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Myth about Hand Tools [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmakingart.com/?p=252#comment-319</guid>
		<description>Bob: Thanks for preaching the gospel. I too am a fan of learning to appreciate and use hand tools. Over the years I've become more convinced that there is great fun using a well-tuned hand tool - a hand plane being perhaps the best example. Keith (www.woodtreks.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: Thanks for preaching the gospel. I too am a fan of learning to appreciate and use hand tools. Over the years I&#8217;ve become more convinced that there is great fun using a well-tuned hand tool - a hand plane being perhaps the best example. Keith (www.woodtreks.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip J.</title>
		<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmakingart.com/?p=252#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Yes - I have CS's Workbench book and he does just that.  A high ideal to ascribe to I must say, my compliments!

See, most non-handtools folks don't know that you gotta have a smoother for softwoods and then another at a higher angle for hardwoods.  Same thing for a jack, with a difference in camber too.  Then there's the foreplane before a jack and for some hardy souls, the scrub.  I have a small scrub and a large scrub.. go figure....

This way, you just reach up and grab the smoother to do what you want - not fiddle around with changing a blade with a different camber and/or cutting angle.  Those folks with $200.00 and up new planes don't spend any time fettling or even much sharpening.  But then they buy several expensive blades to configure different ways - and then wind up spending woodworking project time changing blades out.  Just to not have to buy more than five or six expensive planes.

Well, you carry that thinking over into shaves and other tools and you just paid for a very nice tablesaw. 

Sorry - got carried away - a bit.

Skip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes - I have CS&#8217;s Workbench book and he does just that.  A high ideal to ascribe to I must say, my compliments!</p>
<p>See, most non-handtools folks don&#8217;t know that you gotta have a smoother for softwoods and then another at a higher angle for hardwoods.  Same thing for a jack, with a difference in camber too.  Then there&#8217;s the foreplane before a jack and for some hardy souls, the scrub.  I have a small scrub and a large scrub.. go figure&#8230;.</p>
<p>This way, you just reach up and grab the smoother to do what you want - not fiddle around with changing a blade with a different camber and/or cutting angle.  Those folks with $200.00 and up new planes don&#8217;t spend any time fettling or even much sharpening.  But then they buy several expensive blades to configure different ways - and then wind up spending woodworking project time changing blades out.  Just to not have to buy more than five or six expensive planes.</p>
<p>Well, you carry that thinking over into shaves and other tools and you just paid for a very nice tablesaw. </p>
<p>Sorry - got carried away - a bit.</p>
<p>Skip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobStrawn</title>
		<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>BobStrawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmakingart.com/?p=252#comment-308</guid>
		<description>You just got me thinking, Skip!

I really love Christopher Schwarz' book on Worktables. 
http://www.lostartpress.com/product/3513e08a-2f07-4616-8f2f-74017f296377.aspx

One of the things he does is break down tasks, and give a rating on what fitting is best used to accomplish the task.

I would love to see an article on plane types that goes along this line.  I see listings by names and listings by Stanley number, but I have not seen one by task. 

I may put one together just so someone else can shoot it down or do a better one.  I know a lot about planes, but not enough I think to be an authority here.

I think I will ask this on Woodnet and see how far the discussion goes.

Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just got me thinking, Skip!</p>
<p>I really love Christopher Schwarz&#8217; book on Worktables.<br />
<a href="http://www.lostartpress.com/product/3513e08a-2f07-4616-8f2f-74017f296377.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.lostartpress.com/product/3513e08a-2f07-4616-8f2f-74017f296377.aspx</a></p>
<p>One of the things he does is break down tasks, and give a rating on what fitting is best used to accomplish the task.</p>
<p>I would love to see an article on plane types that goes along this line.  I see listings by names and listings by Stanley number, but I have not seen one by task. </p>
<p>I may put one together just so someone else can shoot it down or do a better one.  I know a lot about planes, but not enough I think to be an authority here.</p>
<p>I think I will ask this on Woodnet and see how far the discussion goes.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip J.</title>
		<link>http://toolmakingart.com/2008/08/26/the-myth-about-hand-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toolmakingart.com/?p=252#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Ok!  Now you're talking!  

My first plane was a contractors' grade Stanley reg angle block from Lowes.  Didn't use it much, went thru just about exactly as you describe here, except it's not for end grain.  My trip down this slope started years later, about a decade ago when I wound up with an almost new Stanley #4 smoother when my father-in-law passed away.  It wouldn't work either...  But this time I started buying handtool books and reading them.  Particularly about how to fettle planes, new and used.  Most folks don't have a clue that new planes are not ready to use out of the box - nowhere near ready.  I had never heard the word fettle, I certainly didn't know what it meant.  

Now I'm at 35 planes, including two different reg angle blocks and a low angle block. Need to thin the herd down tho.....  Too many slopes, not enough time!

Skip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok!  Now you&#8217;re talking!  </p>
<p>My first plane was a contractors&#8217; grade Stanley reg angle block from Lowes.  Didn&#8217;t use it much, went thru just about exactly as you describe here, except it&#8217;s not for end grain.  My trip down this slope started years later, about a decade ago when I wound up with an almost new Stanley #4 smoother when my father-in-law passed away.  It wouldn&#8217;t work either&#8230;  But this time I started buying handtool books and reading them.  Particularly about how to fettle planes, new and used.  Most folks don&#8217;t have a clue that new planes are not ready to use out of the box - nowhere near ready.  I had never heard the word fettle, I certainly didn&#8217;t know what it meant.  </p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m at 35 planes, including two different reg angle blocks and a low angle block. Need to thin the herd down tho&#8230;..  Too many slopes, not enough time!</p>
<p>Skip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
