Back to the Grind

I have quite a few projects planned that are going to need blades.  So I am going to have to get back to work grinding shaping and mangling steel.   On top of that, I really, really need to clean up several of my work areas.  They have gotten a bit unruly and need to be made safe to work around.

One of the projects I have in mind goes a little bit overboard.    I will have to make 48 blades for it.   But first I need to get all the work that needs heat treating done.

Bob

Experimental Rabbet Plane

Jorge, (Lapacho) on Woodnet recently posted his rabbet plane design.  I was intrigued with the concept,  so I made one.  I modified it a bit, but then, I do that.

Rabbet Plane

It makes nice shavings!

shavings

It leaves a smooth finish behind!

smooth wood

I tested it here on a splitting chunk of cedar, not the worst wood but not the best either.

splitty wood

It left a smooth surface.

smooth

Note the crack in the end of the plane.  This is not the best wood for the job.  Too soft, and flawed.  Still it was handy, the right size and easy to work.  Good for an experiment,  Now that I know it works,  I need to make a qood one,

crack in plane

The bottom ‘bed’ does not even touch the upside down chip breaker.   It is just a guide really.

Tight throat

Nice little curls, easy enough to clean out.

Bottom edge gap

I tested shavings.  At .002 inches thick, I could easily make a full width shaving.  At .0015 inches, it would usually be a full width shaving.  At .001 it was a bit sporadic.

The thinnest shavings  were just a hair below .oo1 inches, but with this dry cedar, they were not very substantial and turned to dust easily.

Measuring Shavings

This mechanism allowed a rabbet plane to be stable and

to make a smooth clean surface.

taken apart

The iron and the chipbreaker  are made by Hock and came  from a Woodsmith plane kit.

When I remake it, it will have a slightly steeper angle an adjustable mouth, and be from a much harder wood.

This pretty much proves that Jorge’s concept is  quite solid.  Rabbets are typically pretty unstable and tricky.   This one  is a quick rig, and it works flawlessly.

Bob

Another Way to Make a Rabbet!

Over on Woodnet Hand Tools Forum, Lapacho has shown his version of the rabbet plane. This is of great interest to me, I have made a lot of rabbet planes. While I am now convinced that rabbets are important enough to think that having a pair of matched skew planes is a better way to go, the basic straight rabbet is a very important tool, and it is often a trouble maker.

The problem with rabbets is that they don’t have side support.  This increases the flex in the structure.   Lapacho has come up with a variation that I suspect entirely bypasses that issue.

Bob

Woodwright's Shop

Lately I have been enjoying going back over the Woodwright’s Shop episodes that are available online.

Sweet!

Bob

Is a Copy of a Copy a Crime?

I have waded through a lot of discussions about copies being made of other tool designs. It is quite interesting to see where people stand. It seems that there are several issues that divide how we think about these things. The variations on ethic make this a pretty heated issue. Personally I like this. I think societies need to discuss ethics every now and then.

I have a lot of respect for a good copy. Clark and Willams makes reproductions and I hold them in the highest regard. The company that some people are defending, Lie-Nielsen, makes an upgraded copy of what a lot of people consider the best mass produced planes. I like this too. What is really neat here, is that a upscale, high dollar product, that has been maintained with quality engineering and quality support has loyal supporters, despite being quite expensive.

WoodCraft, is the one with the copy of a copy. It sells for a bit less and looks pretty nice. Woodcraft has given me very good support in the past, so as far as that goes, they might come close to Lie-Nielsen There are folk supporting them in their decisions as well.

I have no objection to competition either. I like the idea of companies competing with each other to provide me with the best price on the best quality goods. The competition between Lee Valley and Lie-Nielsen has been very good for the woodworking community. I suspect it has also been good for both of those companies.  People respect them around the world.  The competition is between innovation and refining old patterns. I like the results.

One of the big issues is the China thing.   A lot of folk are developing a real hatred of things from China or India.  Personally I would rather support the company that takes care of their employees. I would much rather buy from Canada that China for the same reason that I would rather buy food from a share-cropper than a slave owner.  I think that people that share control, profit and future are more likely to make caring decisions.  People who exploit people are much more likely to put toxic stuff in baby formula.  As we turn our face away from the suffering of others, we practice the same skills that endanger our world.

I would rather buy local, but my real priority is to buy ethical.  I would rather not reward selfishness.  Business should be win-win.  I try to consider trade practice, environment and business ethics, when I buy.  I don’t want to give more money and power to a person or company that does not care about people.  Even people who they will never meet, of different faiths, colors and languages.

I approve of WoodCrafts effort to offer quality products at lower prices,  but  I would rather not have products made by underpaid labor drive a quality company like Lie-Nielson out of business.

Given my choice, I prefer to buy from a person.   A good a product can be made by a woodworker, out of wood and steel and bronze.   It just takes a bit of time and care.

Bob